Abstract
The research examines the form and degree of which globalisation and regionalisation have affected trade operation of informal, cross-border traders especially by creating change in border and cross-border trade governance scheme. Through ethnographic fieldwork, it investigates trade and social networks as strategies that local people use to overcome difficulties and benefit from opportunities that created by these processes. Increased regional economic integration in the Greater Mekong Sub-region (GMS)?reinforced by ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA)?has created several changes in cross-border trading activities. Firstly, governments have promoted trade liberalisation through initiatives aimed at facilitating and streamlining cross-border trade. Improvements in transport infrastructure and the removal of trade barriers, for example, have contributed to significant increases in cross-border trade in the GMS. At the same time, however, governments have attempted to regularise and channel flows of trade. This blend of trade liberalisation on the one hand, and increased regulation and formalisation of trade on the other, characterises a new phase of border governance in the GMS. At first sight, it appears that male-dominated, large-scale, cross-border traders who use formal trade channels are the winners in this new trade landscape, while female-dominated, informal cross-border traders who usually conduct trade in smaller scale are the losers. However, there is evidence that a significant number of informal cross-border traders survive and are doing well. Furthermore, there has been a continuous inflow of newcomers into the market. Various authors highlight that networks between cross-border traders and kin and non-kin actors are essential to their survival. However, most of these studies do not provide a complete picture of these trade networks and relationships. Gender relations within networks are rarely given attention, and most studies do not place informal cross-border trading within the context of globalisation and regionalisation. The research use Thai-Lao border at Mukdahan and Savannakhet Provinces of Thailand and Lao PDR as a case study. This area has been selected as it has been one of the main border crossings between Thailand and Laos since many decades. Since 1998, the area has regained importance as an important node in the so-called 'East-West corridor' in the GMS, promoted by the Asian Development Bank and other regional players. As a result, trade and social relations have been changing rapidly in the area. In-depth ethnographic fieldwork gives insight into the strategies used by old and new actors in the area to adapt to these changes.
Author(s): Lada Phadungkiati